Avatar and Anton

this post was buried long time ago


In 2154, the RDA corporation is mining Pandora, a lush, Earth-like moon of the planet Polyphemus, in the Alpha Centauri system. Parker Selfridge, the administrator, employs former marines as mercenaries to provide security. The humans aim to exploit Pandora’s reserves of a valuable mineral called unobtanium (unobtainable titanium :p).

Pandora is inhabited by the Na’vi, a paleolithic species of sapient humanoids with feline characteristics. Physically stronger and several feet taller than humans, the blue-skinned savage indigenous live in their sacred forest worshiping demon spirit called Eywa. The same forest where large deposit of unobtanium rest below.

Humans have tried to establish diplomatic relation. They learn Na’vis’s language, culture, and have been trying negotiating endlessly. However, the Na’vis still refused to move from their forest.

And a crippled man come and a wish and a wuss and a whoop happens. So, war happens. Na’vis with animals and nature power versus humans with their great power of destruction (you’ve seen human race capabilities of killing and destroying in real world, now imagine it has gotten even more effective and efficient) consists of planes, choppers, big robots, big tractors, and a hell lot of firepower. But Na’vis won the war, yes, the movie makers want it that way.


Of course many people would say Avatar is a great movie. But Anton has a great disagreement  with the movie.

I am a man, human, earthling. I am defender of humanity, the inhabitants of Earth, and the interest of human race. As human, my top priority is my kind, that’s my opinion. But Avatar seems to have another idea, which is “we should protect blue monkeys”. I see Na’vi-s as nothing more but animals. When the interest of human collides with the interest of anything beside human, than human’s interest must be the top priority. So, am I an anti-Greenpeace? Or a pro-global-warming? No, not at all. Since I told you that human is number one, then protecting earth and it’s inhabitants is also compulsory. The balance of nature on earth sustains our life. Wild logging, crazy mining, monstrous polluting, etc, they are threats to our life, that’s why we must stop them for our own good. But, when there’s another planet out there, which destruction will not affect our lives, why should we restrain ourselves?  If a valuable mineral buried below an old tree and blue monkeys living there, let’s just evict them. We can just put the blue monkeys on a zoo, turn the tree into woods for bonfire, none of it is wrong for me. And when the blue monkeys refuse to go, let’s just kill them all. Do we feel anything when we kill some mosquitoes? Please don’t overreact. The are not our equal.

The second disagreement is about the main protagonist. Avatar promotes him as a hero. For me, he’s a traitor. It is in our basic principle that loyalty, respect, and trust are values we uphold and pass to our children. Avatar gives a wrong message. A traitor kills his own brothers-in-arms just because he loves a blue monkey. He should be the main antagonist.

Conclusion: Avatar is not good for our mind.

The good thing is: Avatar lost Academy Award for Best Picture to Hurt Locker.  ^^

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s